Friday, June 24, 2005
Bolsheviks vs. Busheviks
When I was a child, my daddy told me that the difference between the godless Commies and ourselves was that we were the good guys. The Commies ran gulags. We did not. The Commies tortured people. We did not. The Commies required an internal passport and government permission to move around their country. We did not.
That, unfortunately was the America of my childhood, not the America of today. I've been pointing out the similarities between the Bolsheviks and Busheviks myself for close to six years now, ever since it became obvious:
About the only difference appears to be a) the ideology espoused (Marx vs. Adam Smith), and the PR-savviness (brutality against foreigners and darkies is okay in Bushevik America, brutality against white Christian Americans is bad PR and to be avoided).
- Bolsheviks used ideology as an excuse for looting the wealth of nations for the benefit of a Party elite. Busheviks use ideology as an excuse for looting the wealth of nations for the benefit of a Party elite.
- Bolsheviks had an ideological handbook written by Karl Marx that they held up with religious reverence anytime anyone questioned their actions. Busheviks have an ideological handbook written by Adam Smith that they hold up with religious reverence anytime anyone questions their actions.
- Bolsheviks imposed a system of internal passports wherein you needed the permission of the State to travel around the country. Busheviks imposed a "no fly list" and state ID requirement wherein you needed the permission of the State to travel around the country.
- Bolsheviks believed in invading countries and overthrowing the legal government of that country if said government espoused an ideology in conflict with theirs. Busheviks believe in invading countries and overthrowing the legal government of that country if said government espouses an ideology in conflict with theirs.
- Bolsheviks wrecked the economies of their countries with rampant militarism and the looting of their economies by the Party elite. Busheviks are wrecking the economy of the United States with rampant militarism and the looting of the U.S. economy by the Party elite.
- Bolsheviks believed that any policeman should have the right to stop you on the streets at any time for any reason and ask for your papers. The Bushevik's Justice Department argued and the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that any policeman has the right to stop you on the streets at any time for any reason and ask for your state-issued ID.
- Bolsheviks believed in gulags and show trials. Busheviks believe in gulags and show trials (c.f. Gitmo).
When did we become our enemy, I wonder? This land full of shuddering cowards, cynical looting politicians, and lack of opportunity is not the America that I grew up in, which (if you were not black) was the land of the free, home of the brave, and the land of opportunity. As a member of the last generation of poor Americans able to get an education on Uncle Sam's dime before Reagan basically dismantled the Pell Grant/BEOG system, I was grateful for the opportunity to prove myself, and pay more in taxes every year now than I received in Pell Grants over my entire college career (something that cannot be said for my schoolmates who did not go on to college, most of whom pay no taxes at all). If those taxes were going to pay for some other poor kid's education, I wouldn't mind at all. Alas, they're not. They're going to pay for Mk77 firebombs (napalm).
But perhaps that is inevitable, in a country where the majority of people apparently don't give a shit....
- Badtux the Patriotic Non-Bushevik American Penguin
Posted by: BadTux / 6/24/2005 09:07:00 AM
It's worth noting that some of the most prominent Busheviks ARE former Bolsheviks, most notably the neocon ideologues like David Horowitz.
They like to claim that it's proof of the bankruptcy of the "left," as though left-liberalism was the same as Bolshevism. But it says more about how similar the general mindsets are of Stalinists and current-day Republicans, even if they follow different professed ideologies.
# posted by drumwolf : 24/6/05 10:55 AM
I'd like to point out that they are not followers of Adam Smith.
Adam Smith said a bunch of stuff, but he said the two things which could bankrupt an economy were buying "trinkets & baubles" and corporate collusion. Nowadays the government funds corporate collusion.
Another thing Smith said was that businesspeople couldn't possibly manage to have dinner together without consumers getting shafted.
But perhaps my favorite quote, stricken from all Patriotic American editions (p. 267 of the Glasgow edition) says that no law proposed by the dealers should be given serious attention, and should be eyed with suspicion. He says such laws "come from an order of men, whose interest is never exactly the same with that of the public, who have generally an interest to deceive and even oppress the public, and who accordingly have, upon many occasions, both deceived and oppressed it."
I'm not saying he was the Saint of Leftiness, but he was no neo-con, either.
The other classic that lefties have, for with which to armor themsylves foreth the fight, is Montesquieu's Spirit of Laws. In some parts, he could be mistaken for a commie.
# posted by josh narins : 25/6/05 9:03 PM
Excellent post. On the same minor point, I'm in agreement w/ Josh Narins.
This is crony capitalism, an oligarchical looting of public resources. Nothing that Adam Smith would have signed off on.
I'm also in agreement w/ drumwolf. The neocons have become the monsters they once sought to destroy.
# posted by Thom H : 28/6/05 4:18 PM
Note that "Communism" as implemented by Stalin, Mao, etc. would not be recognized by Marx either, even if they did espouse Marxist sloganry. Similarly, today's neo-cons spout Adam Smith's stuff... but as pointed out, follow his stuff about as well as the Communists followed Marx.
# posted by BadTux : 30/6/05 5:30 PM
- Name: BadTux
- Location: Some iceberg, South Pacific, Antarctica
I am a black and white and yellow multicolored penguin making his way as best he can in a world of monochromic monkeys.
View my complete profile
April 2004 / December 2004 / January 2005 / February 2005 / March 2005 / April 2005 / May 2005 / June 2005 / July 2005 / August 2005 / September 2005 / October 2005 / November 2005 / December 2005 / January 2006 / February 2006 / March 2006 / April 2006 / May 2006 / June 2006 / July 2006 / August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / February 2007 / March 2007 / April 2007 / May 2007 / June 2007 / July 2007 / August 2007 /
Bill Richardson: Because what America needs is a competent fat man with bad hair as President (haven't we had enough incompetent pretty faces?)
Cost of the War in Iraq